|
POTENTIALLY
AVOIDABLE READMISSIONS |
General information - overview Products - hospital costs Contact us: - contact us |
|
Aim |
Measuring the quality of
hospital discharges. A potentially avoidable
readmission may be considered as the consequence of an adverse event or a too
early discharge. |
|
Definition of the indicator |
Number of potentially avoidable
readmissions (cases) divided by the number of eligible discharges |
|
Cases |
Readmissions related to a
condition of the previous hospitalization and not expected as part of a
program of phased care, occurring within 30 days after the previous
discharge. Cases are identified by a computerized algorithm. This algorithm
excludes foreseen readmissions like readmissions for transplantation,
delivery, chemo- or radiotherapy, and other specific surgical procedure.
Similarly, readmissions for new conditions, unknown during the preceding stay
are not considered as avoidable. Readmissions in a different hospital are identified with the anonymous
patient linkage code developed by the Swiss office for statistics (BFS/OFS)
and included in the numerator. |
|
Eligible discharges |
Hospital discharge of an alive
patient, followed 30 days, censoring for foreseen readmission. Healthy
newborns, candidates for one day surgery, in hospital death and patients
living in other countries are excluded. |
|
Comments |
Most studies use unplanned
readmissions as a proxy of potentially avoidable readmissions ; this is an
inadequate approach: some unplanned readmissions may be nevertheless expected
at discharge (readmission for delivery or organ transplant of a patient on a
transplantation list); many unplanned readmissions are caused by a new
problem unrelated to any condition treated during the previous admission; on
the contrary some readmissions for a complication, unforeseen at the time of
discharge are planned during the follow-up : example is reopening of a
surgical site after discharge. |
|
Risk
adjustment |
|
|
|
These groups are protected by
copyright (© Yves Eggli, 2009). More detailed information is given in the
user manual. Adjustment model : Poisson
regression based on the groups described above, age, gender, previous
admission within six month, and elective admission. Reference population: 3’209’670 discharges dataset of 262
Swiss hospitals having data of adequate quality (from December 1st
2003 to November 30th 2007). |
|
Scientific validation |
The sensitivity and the
specificity of the screening algorithm reached both 95% in a random sample of
admission readmission pairs drawn in a university hospital, which was used to
develop the screening tool. The
predictive value of the screen in a random sample of 18 public Swiss
hospitals (nearly a thousand medical records of detected admission
readmission pairs) showed that it was close to 80 percent in hospitals whose
data fulfil the required criteria of quality. SQLape® groups showed a statistically significant higher
discrimination power than other patients classification systems (C statistics
= 0.72 in the validation set). Reference for more details : -
Halfon P, -
Halfon P, Eggli Y, Prêtre-Rohrbach I, Meylan D, Marazzi A, Burnand B.
Validation of the potentially avoidable hospital readmission rate as a
routine indicator of the quality of hospital care. Medical Care
2006;44(11);972-981. |
|
Implementation |
For more details about required
data and material, format, software package implementation, click on the following
button: Manuel technique (French) Technisches Handbuch (German) |
Last update: July 9, 2009