|
HOSPITAL |
General information - overview Products - hospital costs Contact us - contact us |
|
Aim |
To predict the costs of
inpatients |
|
Definition of the indicator |
Cost = total amount of resources
consumed divided by the number of inpatient discharges. |
|
SQLape categories |
Inpatients are allocated to one
or several affections or operations. Each category is defined by inclusion
and exclusion criteria, detailed in the manual “SQLape® - hospital costs
prediction”. Inclusion criteria are based on the Swiss surgical intervention
nomenclature (CHOP-XI, a Swiss adaptation of the ICD-9-CM) for operations and
on the International classification of diseases (ICD-10) for affections,
including optional additional codes (German adaptation of ICD-10). Four types of exclusion are applied,
in order to reduce the redundancy of information : 1. if many interventions have
been performed on the same organ, only the most invasive is taken into
account; 2. a health problem (diagnosis)
related to an operated organ is not taken into account; 3. some surgical or medical
categories are excluded if they are associated with other specified
categories 4. some surgical or medical
categories are excluded if they are associated with specified combination of
categories. Examples: A predominant
operation (organ transplant or caesarean) removes all other operations or
affections. In the absence of such predominant operations, predominant
affections (leukaemia, premature newborns, obstetrical conditions remove also
all other affections and operations. In other cases, all major affections –
i.e. justifying hospitalisations, for instance: acute myocardial infarct or
encephalitis – and all other operations are all retained. Non major
affections are considered only in the absence of an other category.
More examples to illustrate these hierarchical rules can be found in the
manual “SQLape® - hospital costs prediction”. The SQLape® grouper
allocates to each stay a principal category (indicated by the letter p in the
grouper output), using the following order: predominant operations,
predominant affections, major operations, major affections, minor affections
(ou sont les minor operartions?). In addition, the most vital systems takes
precedence (prematurity, respiratory, nervous, cardiac, hepatic, digestive,
urinary, musculoskeletal systems, etc.). The attribution of a primary
category in thus independent of the order in which health problems are coded
in medical records. |
|
Expected costs |
The expected cost of an
inpatient discharge is equal to the sum of the cost weights of SQLape®
categories allocated to the stay. A correction is brought when a patient is
transferred from or to an other hospital, provided that the two following
conditions are met : 1) the length of stay is shorter than expected
according to the case mix; 2) the patient is transferred in or from another acute
care setting (transfer to a nursing home is not taken into account for
instance). The expected cost weights of
each inpatient stay are automatically computed by the grouper. |
|
Option |
Hospitals or financial
allocation authorities may be interested to compute cost weights by themselves.
Several methods can be applied, especially to identify the best practice
hospitals and to exclude outliers. The optional “cost management tool”
provides a simple approach to split the costs of hospital stays into several
category affections or operations (cost control); this tool also provides
specific cost weights, computed by the observed mean the data set after
excluding outliers (greater or less than six time the observed mean,
determined with four iterations). Technical support is also given to develop
other cost weights computation rules. |
|
Scientific
validation |
Cost weights have been computed
with a random sample of Swiss hospital data (one University hospital and many
public hospitals of various size). A cross validation has then be applied, to
compare expected and observed values on another random sample (coefficient of
determination R2): SQLape® - without length of stay adjustment : R2
= 0,55 DRGs groupers - without length of stay adjustment : R2
= 0,38 to 0,44 For more details : Marazzi A, Gardiol L, Duong HD. New approaches to
reimbursement schemes based on DRGs and their comparison. Health Services
Management Research 2007;20(3):203-210. |
|
For more details about required
data and material, format, software package implementation, click on the left
button : Manuel technique (French) Technisches Handbuch (German) |
Last update: July 9, 2009